RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

[Adam Williamson]

On 06/03/13 09:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Mar 2013 18:31:06 -0800
> Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> We do already have an AutoQA test which runs rpmguard, and rpmguard
>> notes dependency/provision version changes. Here it is spotting an
>> ABI bump for binutils:
>>
>> http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/results/531743-autotest/qa02.qa/rpmguard/results/binutils-2.23.52.0.1.html
>>
>> Now, whether you'd want to somehow parse such results out from the
>> existing rpmguard test externally, or write a new more specific test,
>> or do something else, or dance a little jig, is a different question.
>> But to a certain extent we're Already Doing That. The rpmguard test
>> is currently entirely informational, no policies are enforced, but
>> you can go read the output if you want to be an informed package
>> maintainer...
>
> Sure. Note however that we don't currently run autoqa on rawhide builds
> and that was at least the initial target for this. ;)

Um. I think we do? I see results from rpmguard (and other tests) for 
builds with 'fc19' in them at 
http://autoqa.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/frontend , right now.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net