Is there a reason we do not turn on the file system hardlink/symlink protection in Rawhide?

[Casey Dahlin]

Ok, apparently Mutt is a bit stupider than I thought. Let's try this again.

On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 02:20:04PM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> We already do,

Good.

> but this protection does protect unconfined_t and for those who

Maybe we're ready to except a confined user by default. Something very, very
loose.

> would dare to disable SELinux.

To hell with 'em. :)

--CJD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130314/3e11c9b3/attachment.sig>