fedora release name problem

[Sérgio Basto]

On Ter, 2013-03-19 at 14:29 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: 
> On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 11:26 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-03-19 at 14:14 -0400, John.Florian at dart.biz wrote:
> > > > From: Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> 
> > > > 
> > > > On 19/03/13 08:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 19 Mar 2013 14:33, <John.Florian at dart.biz
> > > > > <mailto:John.Florian at dart.biz>> wrote:
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" <rjones at redhat.com
> > > > > <mailto:rjones at redhat.com>>
> > > > >  > >
> > > > >  > > An interesting question is:  Why don't we try out the new
> > > release name
> > > > >  > > early on in Rawhide.  ie. we would change the release name
> > > now to
> > > > >  > > whatever F20 is going to be + " (Rawhide)".  Wouldn't that
> > > give us a
> > > > >  > > lot more time to test and fix?
> > > > >  >
> > > > >  > That seems like a great idea ... and it also adds in a test for
> > > > > handling parenthesis.  I can't imagine how they'd pose a problem,
> > > but
> > > > > clearly nobody foresaw this train coming either.
> > > > >
> > > > > Err the fedora 19 voting for names started around the release of
> > > F18
> > > > > alpha. Its been set as this for around 6 months already, I suspect
> > > its
> > > > > only become an issue with people starting to create images etc.
> > > > 
> > > > It isn't applied anywhere till branch. Rawhide always uses the
> > > release 
> > > > name 'Rawhide'. Even though it's voted on a long way ahead of time,
> > > the 
> > > > new release name is only applied in the tree at branch time.
> > > Several 
> > > > people were using Rawhide considerably in advance of branching - 
> > > > including myself - and the problems showed up right when we branched
> > > and 
> > > > the new fedora-release package was rolled.
> > > 
> > > Ah, that makes sense.  I had no idea how feasible name + " (Rawhide)"
> > > would be, I just liked the idea. 
> > 
> > It's an interesting idea, but I suspect it may break rather more stuff
> > than people expect :) Be neat to try though, and Rawhide is certainly
> > the place to break it.
> 
> I vote for Räwh'de myself :-)

hi, state my point of view , my last email just go to Chris Murphy
thing is, we introduce one ö (my keyboard don't have it) is like what I
have to leave with my é of Sérgio and one apostrophe , so cases complete
different. I bet ö will give much more problems .
I'm not saying to forget the bug, I'm saying: hey, this introduce a
bug , so first, we roll-back, second we fix the bug and third when bug
or bugs are fixed , we put release name with "what ever we want"


Cheers,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.