Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?
lists at petetravis.com
Sat May 4 04:54:34 UTC 2013
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 9:40 PM, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <znmeb at znmeb.net>wrote:
> I didn't notice this the last time I did an install. But yes, it's a
> *problem* if it does that. I'll upvote or whatever if someone re-opens; I
> do so many installs in coffee shops that I would flat out not use a distro
> that did this!
Regardless of the arguments for either position, whether for ease of use
pseudosecurity or for peace of mind and tradition, I think the above will
from the world at large. There may be valid and convincing reasons to
obfuscating passwords, but doing so would put Fedora supporters in the
presenting those justifications regularly.
Personally, I think it presents a false sense of security, and any valid
easily be rectified by changing the password after installation. However,
**expect** that security, and the result of removing it will be calamitous.
lambasted by the tech press, flamed on user forums, and dejected
server rooms. Opportunities to provide a righteous counterargument will be
I'll make a small concession here. The demographic most affected by the
I'm describing are casual or inexperienced users, and not part of Fedora's
user base. Keep in mind that these users are also prospective Fedora
have the potential to gain experience, become proficient, and perhaps even
People **will** bitch about being able to read the password as they type
is Good Press" is a bromide that Fedora shouldn't test.
- Pete Travis
- Fedora Docs Project Leader
- 'randomuser' on freenode
- immanetize at fedoraproject.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the devel