Do you think this is a security risk and if not is it a bad UI decision?

Adam Williamson awilliam at
Thu May 9 04:02:43 UTC 2013

On Wed, 2013-05-08 at 22:36 -0400, Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2013-05-08 10:09 (GMT+0200) Pierre-Yves Chibon composed:
> > you are replying to a 4 days old email on a thread that is no
> > longer active?
> A: The thread was started on a Friday night.
> B: Some people don't get to read mail every day, or more than a few or less 
> times a week.
> A + B = perfectly justified timing of reply.

C: the debate was taken to every place it could possibly go, and the
commit was reverted.

So what's the point of reviving it? Sometimes, if you don't get your
$0.02 posted in time, it's best to just sit on it.
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | adamwfedora

More information about the devel mailing list