Adding new group to comps-f19.xml.in

[Ravindra Kumar]

Hi Bill and others, 

Based on the earlier discussions in the emails, I have following diff for comps-f19.xml.in: 

--- comps-f19.xml.in 2013-04-29 17:41:10.003026000 -0700 
+++ comps-f19.xml.in.new 2013-05-08 20:35:57.000112000 -0700 
@@ -7,6 +7,9 @@ 
<_description>Local X.org display server</_description> 
<default>false</default> 
<uservisible>false</uservisible> 
+ <grouplist> 
+ <groupid>virt-agents-x</groupid> 
+ </grouplist> 
<packagelist> 
<packagereq>xorg-x11-drv-ati</packagereq> 
<packagereq>xorg-x11-drv-evdev</packagereq> 
@@ -1150,6 +1153,9 @@ 
<_description>Common set of utilities that extend the minimal installation.</_description> 
<default>false</default> 
<uservisible>false</uservisible> 
+ <grouplist> 
+ <groupid>virt-agents</groupid> 
+ </grouplist> 
<packagelist> 
<packagereq>acl</packagereq> 
<packagereq>at</packagereq> 
@@ -5633,6 +5639,26 @@ 
</packagelist> 
</group> 
<group> 
+ <id>virt-agents</id> 
+ <_name>Virtualization Agents</_name> 
+ <_description>These packages enable better management of virtual machine.</_description> 
+ <default>true</default> 
+ <uservisible>true</uservisible> 
+ <packagelist> 
+ <packagereq type="default">open-vm-tools</packagereq> 
+ </packagelist> 
+ </group> 
+ <group> 
+ <id>virt-agents-x</id> 
+ <_name>Virtualization Agents</_name> 
+ <_description>These packages enable better user experience for virtual machine.</_description> 
+ <default>true</default> 
+ <uservisible>true</uservisible> 
+ <packagelist> 
+ <packagereq type="default">open-vm-tools-desktop</packagereq> 
+ </packagelist> 
+ </group> 
+ <group> 
<id>virtualization</id> 
<_name>Virtualization</_name> 
<_description>These packages provide a virtualization environment.</_description> 

Could you please confirm if this is what you are expecting and how to test it? Wiki page 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_use_and_edit_comps.xml_for_package_groups 
says nothing about testing apart from running 'xsltproc'. I ran 'xsltproc' and it does not 
say anything about a 'group' containing a 'grouplist', so I'm not sure if this will work 
or not. 

Thanks, 
Ravindra 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130508/9a5f7488/attachment.html>