Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk
awilliam at redhat.com
Sat May 11 19:22:15 UTC 2013
On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 22:01 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> 01.05.2013 23:07, Matthias Clasen:
> > On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 11:46 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> >> Whether I have to create bugreports?
> > Creating patches would be more interesting.
> Creating patches is greate idea - but is too hard for one man.
> I created dependency graph for some qt-based applications (green color)
> against gtk*/*gnome* ones (red).
*gnome* is too simplistic. There are 'GNOME' things that aren't really
> Sorry for big picture - it is because of loopbacks.
> Problematic dependencies that I found:
> qgit -> git -> libgnome_keyring
...like this one, for instance. libgnome-keyring's dependencies are
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
You can rip out gtk2 without losing libgnome-keyring.
> opencv -> gtk2;
> xscreensaver_base -> libglade2 -> gtk2;
> librsvg2 -> gtk3;
These ones look a bit more significant. xscreensaver-base's dep on gtk2
in particular looks odd.
> The question is - are these dependencies unbreakable?
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
More information about the devel