FPC elections

Josh Boyer jwboyer at gmail.com
Thu May 16 11:16:40 UTC 2013

On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:25 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:
> Dne 14.5.2013 20:46, Josh Boyer napsal(a):
>>> Heck the community did not have the faintest idea which tickets they even
>>> worked ( or did any work at all )  on until I literally request they
>>> adopted
>>> the fesco model so we atleast could get a faint idea what was going to be
>>> discussed on those meeting...
>> Sounds like working with them has paid off nicely.  Maybe you should
>> do more of that.
>>> Let's just continue to cross finger hope that those that have been chosen
>>> <-- yeah that's right not elected but chosen bother to show up to do
>>> their
>>> due diligence and reach a quorum.
>> The elections are open, and the voting is not rigged.  You can be
>> displeased all you like about who gets elected and what they choose
>> (or not choose) to look at, but that doesn't make those committees a
>> farce.
> This complaint was about FPC and you are unfortunately wrong about that:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2013-April/009068.html
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel-announce/2013-May/001147.html
> There is nothing like open election to FPC.

Ah.  I thought he was referring to FESCo and being hyperbolic.


More information about the devel mailing list