Does -devel package name only indicate "C" development packages?

Tomasz Torcz tomek at pipebreaker.pl
Sat May 18 10:35:29 UTC 2013


On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:18:41AM -0400, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=962081
> 
> I have a request to change the name of selinux-policy-devel to
> selinux-policy-devel-support, since
> 
> "everywhere else in the distro -devel means just header files in c and not any
> other development tools and we have several scripts that assume that's the case."
 
  That's some strange interpretation. I completly don't agree with that.

> selinux-policy-devel contains interface files and tools required to build
> selinux-policy.  It also currently contains the man pages, which I can move to
> the base package.

  That seems like a perfect description for what -devel is.  For normal usage
selinux-policy is required.  For building and modification – -devel package. Seems
completely intuitive for me.

  About assumptions: does ‘rpmlint selinux-policy.spec‘ complains?

-- 
Tomasz Torcz                                                       72->|   80->|
xmpp: zdzichubg at chrome.pl                                          72->|   80->|



More information about the devel mailing list