Software Management call for RFEs

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Fri May 24 19:41:41 UTC 2013


On Fri, 24 May 2013 15:15:30 -0400
Rahul Sundaram <metherid at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 05/23/2013 09:10 AM, Jan Zelený wrote:
> > TBH I'm not perfectly sure what causes the problem but since the new
> > "multilib" in Ubuntu started I am dealing with a whole bunch of
> > issues like the one I described. So to sum up, I personally think
> > we are doing much better with the way how things work in Fedora.
> 
> Not really.  We are focusing only on the x86_64/x86 case and ignoring 
> the broader problem which Debian has tackled.  Jumping to the
> conclusion that because you had some multi-lib issues in Ubuntu, we
> are doing better is premature.  Considering the fact that ARM is
> going to become primary architecture for Fedora, we really need to
> solve the broader problem one way or the other.

It was my understanding that arm is not going to do any multilib. 

aarch64 cannot run other stuff, so you cannot run armv7 or whatever on
a aarch64 box, it's just completely different. 

(I sure hope this is the case)

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130524/dcd63810/attachment.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list