Build control-center in mock fail

[Björn Persson]

Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> > I'm sure we could ask the FPC to add this to guidelines.
> > I've filed such a ticket, please feel free to add comments:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/295
> 
> It's reasonable, but is missing an important feature. "All source
> materials for the RPM must also be contained in the new SRPM,
> preferably as source material." This creates a preference for source
> rather than .jar, .war, or .gem files, but I think that's really
> desirable.

The requirement to build from source is already explicit:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#No_inclusion_of_pre-built_binaries_or_libraries

Björn Persson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130526/662cb6a4/attachment.sig>