sharutils license correction
paul at cypherpunks.ca
Wed May 29 22:39:56 UTC 2013
On Tue, 28 May 2013, Petr Pisar wrote:
> I've corrected license declaration at sharutils package:
> The only effective difference is the texinfo documentation is covered by
> GFDL instead of GPL.
Why do we even bother shipping an old obsoleted documentation format
only RMS can actually use? In the case of sharutils, we actually have
what appears to be proper man pages.
Maybe I should add a Feature for F20 :
"convert all info pages to proper man pages and obsolete: the info package."
More information about the devel