Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation
cschalle at redhat.com
Sat Nov 2 12:51:35 UTC 2013
It is a good question. It does seem a bit more detailed than the level I tried to put this document on, so
maybe should a style guide would be part of second stage working group output. But what probably would belong in this
document would be a paragraph saying we intend to come up with such a sub-document.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Nottingham" <notting at redhat.com>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
Cc: desktop at lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 2:43:37 PM
Subject: Re: Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation
Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller (cschalle at redhat.com) said:
> Hi everyone,
> Attached is the draft PRD for the Workstation working group. The
> proposal tries to be relatively high level and focus on goals and
> principles, but I have included some concrete examples at times to try
> to provide some clarity on how the goals and principles could play out
> in practice.
> I hope the community at large will take the time to read through it and
> provide feedback so that when the working group meet next we can use
> that feedback to start tuning in on the final form of the PRD.
> Also in the name of openness, before I sent this here, I showed the PRD
> draft to key stakeholders and decision makers inside Red Hat, to ensure
> that we have the necessary support for these plans to get the kind of
> engineering resources allocated from Red Hat we will need to pull this
Something that doesn't seem specified here is any sort of a design style or
guide for how apps used in the Workstation should generally be built and
function. Is there intended to be that sort of standard?
devel mailing list
devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel