Fedora Working Groups: Call for Self-Nominations
kevin.kofler at chello.at
Sat Nov 2 15:17:39 UTC 2013
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 04:40 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > And I would argue that having the user interface swing wildly in design
>> > & implementation based on "the current composition of an elected board
>> > that is refreshed in part every six months" is not the sort of
>> > situation that Fedora would want to be in anyway.
>> That's a very lame excuse for sticking with an awful desktop environment
>> as the default just because it is the status quo.
> Not excellent...please avoid insulting other people's hard work just
> because you are working on something else.
You got the causality wrong: It's not that I call GNOME "awful" because I
work on KDE, but that I work on KDE because GNOME does not fulfill my needs
and expectations at all. (Even GNOME 2 didn't, but GNOME 3 went even further
away from it.)
More information about the devel