Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation
bnocera at redhat.com
Mon Nov 4 09:45:13 UTC 2013
That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :)
----- Original Message -----
> On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> > Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by
> > stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers
> > don't want stabilizationt they invent workarounds like sandboxes?
> > Wouldn't it be easier to have stable API for some period of time?
> > You mean ABI and not API but your question is answered already in the
> > comments at
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2013/02/01/developer-hackfest-status/
> > " Ideally we *do* want most app to share the system libs, but only
> > those, not the non-core libraries of varying ABI stability and quality.
> > This way we can work hard to make the core 100% ABI backwards"
> Mateusz Marzantowicz
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel