Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Bastien Nocera]

That's fine. The apps would ship directly from upstream, not from Fedora :)

----- Original Message -----
> On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > Hi
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
> > 
> > Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by
> > 
> >     stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers
> >     don't want stabilizationt they invent workarounds like sandboxes?
> >     Wouldn't it be easier to have stable API for some period of time?
> > 
> > 
> > You mean ABI and not API but your question is answered already in the
> > comments at
> > http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2013/02/01/developer-hackfest-status/
> > 
> > " Ideally we *do* want most app to share the system libs, but only
> > those, not the non-core libraries of varying ABI stability and quality.
> > This way we can work hard to make the core 100% ABI backwards"
> > 
> 
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
> 
> 
> 
> Mateusz Marzantowicz
> 
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct