Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Mon Nov 4 09:49:44 UTC 2013


On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 9:03 AM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
<mmarzantowicz at osdf.com.pl> wrote:
> On 03.11.2013 20:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 1:57 PM, Mateusz Marzantowicz
>>
>> Do I understand correctly that first problem could be solved by
>>
>>     stabilizing APIs used in various Linux projects? Because developers
>>     don't want stabilizationt they invent workarounds like sandboxes?
>>     Wouldn't it be easier to have stable API for some period of time?
>>
>>
>> You mean ABI and not API but your question is answered already in the
>> comments at
>> http://blogs.gnome.org/alexl/2013/02/01/developer-hackfest-status/
>>
>> " Ideally we *do* want most app to share the system libs, but only
>> those, not the non-core libraries of varying ABI stability and quality.
>> This way we can work hard to make the core 100% ABI backwards"
>>
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries

See Bastien's reply you missed the point.


More information about the devel mailing list