Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

[Reindl Harald]

Am 04.11.2013 19:25, schrieb Florian Müllner:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler at chello.at> wrote:
>> Florian Müllner wrote:
>>> ... or users having to update their *entire* system to
>>> unstable/experimental versions if they want to try the lastest
>>> Firefox/Libreoffice/Eclipse
>>
>> Then either upstream or the Fedora packager should just build the unstable
>> version against the stable Fedora in a PPA. See e.g. kde-unstable for KDE
>> betas.
> 
> This does not work if the unstable package depends on an unstable
> version of a dependency shared with the stable system, e.g. if kate
> depends on an experimental Qt version, your current choice is to not
> test it or have all of KDE use an unstable version of Qt.

and in that case you think you da anybody a favor looking at the big
picture by having 2,3,4,5 different versions of libraries statically
linked and nobody cares about security updates of the bundles?

in a perfect world they would get updates because the bundeled libraries
in the real life *nobody* will care as long the app runs



-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131104/d0bdbba4/attachment.sig>