Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net
Mon Nov 4 20:02:24 UTC 2013

Am 04.11.2013 20:56, schrieb drago01:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 8:49 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>> that's all true but you can be pretty sure if a "app-store" with
>> bundeled applications exists *nobody* would package and maintain
>> them as RPM -> everybody would point with his finger to the app
> No because RPM packages apps *do* have benifits .. otherwise we
> wouldn't have this discussion.
>> if it goes in that direction, and it starts faster than anybody likes
>> you do a dramatical harm to the userbase which likes the consistent
>> package managment and *really used* conecpt of shared libraries
> Again those are NOT MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE. You can have sandboxed *and*
> rpm packaged apps at the same time.

the most imporant word in your answer is *CAN*

but you will not, nobody will package whatever application
as RPM if he is fine with the app-store, so you *could*
have both but i doubt at the end of the day it will happen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 263 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131104/b51fc139/attachment.sig>

More information about the devel mailing list