gtk3 broken/missing icons on kde

drago01 drago01 at
Tue Nov 5 07:23:22 UTC 2013

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at> wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-10-27 at 01:46 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > I don't think we'd really be correct in blocking the release for such
>> > issues - especially not Beta. We used to have 'polish' criteria for
>> > Final which at least required the icons used in the system menus - i.e.
>> > what's specified in the app's .desktop file - to be sane for all
>> > installed applications, but we dropped that (and other polish criteria)
>> > with the F19/F20 criteria re-write on the basis that they were really
>> > stretching a bit too far and would be unlikely to hold up to a 'last
>> > blocker before release' acid test. Stuff like this doesn't break
>> > anyone's use of the system catastrophically and can reasonably be fixed
>> > with updates.
>> But it also affects the live images (making them look very unpolished) and
>> we don't respin those.
> That's why I said 'reasonably' not 'perfectly' :) I can see an argument
> for blocking Final, though in practice, I don't think our current
> standards are such that it really makes sense to claim our final
> releases are so smooth as to be worth enforcing a high standard of
> polish via the blocker mechanisms

Then we should that. There is a difference between "perfect" and something that
looks obviously broken.

More information about the devel mailing list