Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com
Wed Nov 6 19:45:46 UTC 2013


On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> I'm still slightly out of sync with the fedora.next stuff (REALLY picked
> a bad time to go on vacation), but it does seem to me that a decent
> amount of 'mature reflection' was done on it before it was approved, at
> least.

I don't really have a problem in believing that but it would be useful to
know in more detail how the initial proposals came to be (who were
involved?  what problems are we trying to solve?  what are failures of the
current model?  did it go through Red Hat management internally before
being proposed and is more headcount being allotted?  Was Fedora Board and
FESCo members aware that a proposal were coming through and what was their
rationale for choosing to go forward? etc)

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20131106/9bba4766/attachment.html>

More information about the devel mailing list