Draft Product Description for Fedora Workstation

Olav Vitters olav at vitters.nl
Thu Nov 7 13:57:16 UTC 2013

On Thu, Nov 07, 2013 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 11/06/2013 11:30 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
> >On Wed, Nov 06, 2013 at 10:55:30PM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> >>Has this "sanboxed-bundled-from-upstream"  proposal been discussed with
> >>other distributions? If the final result is that the "Universal Linux
> >>Package" only works in Fedora we are not gaining anything.
> >
> >A lot of this is being based on technology that's not really available
> >yet such as kdbus, Wayland, systemd bits. This has been discussed at
> >GUADEC (GNOME conference):
> >http://www.superlectures.com/guadec2013/sandboxed-applications-for-gnome
> "Wayland" and "systemd" strongly suggest no Ubuntu interoperability
> whatsoever.  Shouldn't this be a top priority for bundled
> applications?

Canonical does what Canonical wants to do. They already have their own
solution for something like this. It is just very distribution specific
and not as secure as what this is proposing AFAIK.


More information about the devel mailing list