Packaing question: need some includes from kernel source
a.badger at gmail.com
Tue Nov 19 21:12:43 UTC 2013
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 06:05:20PM +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Maybe this should be added to an existing package. I forgot to mention
> that during a review I was told not to have multiple sources.
<nod> The main reason is so that the two packages can evolve independent of
each other. You don't want to have to update your package because the other
source changed. That would seem to apply here as well.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel