F21 System Wide Change: Headless Java
mmaslano at redhat.com
Thu Nov 21 10:06:44 UTC 2013
On 20/11/13 20:23, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 08:13:02PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> We were speaking about giving more power to SIGs related to
>> discussion about Fedora.next. This can be a good start. Stano and
>> Aleksandar are working on Java maintenance a lot, Java SIG members
>> are speaking together, so I have a confidence in their actions.
> This is a tangent but -- some people have been talking about giving more
> power to SIGs but at the last env and stacks meeting we sorta settled on
> more power to SIGs in an experimental, anything-goes repo. We're not
> tlaking about that here.
For now. I would be for more power to SIGs, because who does the work
has the responsibility. I don't think people outside Java word can
decide how it should be done.
I still don't see any reason, why should be Change proposal done
differently. Could you sum it up in few points?
More information about the devel