debuginfo packages available in updates later than regular packages.
manisandro at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 10:39:38 UTC 2013
On 26.11.2013 03:55, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jan Kratochvil wrote:
>> There were multiple Bugs suggesting the same, they are linked together for
>> example from this one from 2005. But it all got WONTFIXed:
>> Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm
> The problem with those dependencies is that -debuginfo covers all the
> subpackages, so which one should it require? All of them? That's more often
> than not NOT what I want. (E.g., do we really want to force everyone to
> install gcc-* just because ABRT/DrKonqi/whatever wants to install the
> (usually unneeded) debugging information for libgcc? Getting gcc-debuginfo
> dragged in is bad enough!)
Here is a quick and dirty spec implementing the idea I described: .
From what I can see it behaves correctly with any combination of
packages and subpackages installed. Am I missing something?
More information about the devel