Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

[Chris Murphy]

On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:24 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson <johannbg at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> People are supporting me plenty privately

This answer does not hold up to scrutiny as a response to Jirka's inquiry. Such an arrangement requires publicly visible proxies to be credible. An alternative arrangement is for your mission statement to be presented to the community for non-binding vote. But on the face of it, the above assertion is a non-sequitur consider your implied lack of transparency in the Fedora-Red Hat relationship. It's simply an inappropriate suggestion that more lack of transparency, that's merely in opposition with another, is the way forward.

Chris Murphy