prelink performance gains

[Jan Kratochvil]

On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 21:08:40 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Am 15.10.2013 21:05, schrieb Jan Kratochvil:
> > It depends, for example in this case prelink saves 33% of time (and battery):
> > 	i=0;time while [ $i -lt 1000 ];do /usr/bin/gnome-open --help &>/dev/null;i=$[$i+1];done
> 
> where are the numbers?
> prove it!

33% is the number.  It was 2.848s vs. 4.291s, that is 33.63%.


> and after that start your brain and compare that numbers with
> the battery wasted by prelinking itself,

prelinking never runs on battery, or it is a bug if it does.
At least I run notebook 24x7 on AC and only occasionally I take it out with
battery, then prelink works perfectly for me as I have described it.


> nobody but you is running CGI these days
> anybody but you is using fast-cgi

OT: I use mod_perl for majority of my web code.


Jan