Anyone else using and interested in co-maintaining sogo?

[Jan-Frode Myklebust]

Ludovic, could you please comment on the status here? Can we build SOGo
and all it's dependencies from upstream gnustep, SOPE, etc.. or are
there special "SOGo"-versions of these we'll need? And what is the
relationship between SOPE 2.0.7 from http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/ 
and SOPE from http://sope.opengroupware.org/ ? Which one should Fedora
provide?

Ref:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-October/190217.html
for start of thread.


  -jf
 
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 06:22:41PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> On 16.10.2013 18:13, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
> >I'm using sogo on RHEL6 at work, and would gladly help maintaining it
> >for Fedora. But, I've been expecting this would be a difficult job
> >because I thought SOGo/inverse maintained their own patched gnustep,
> >sope or something like that. Is that not the case?
> The only change I needed for GNUStep was applied to Fedora [1]. Now,
> everything works fine from what I see (though my current setup is
> not terribly complex). Obviously, more testing is more than welcome
> :)
> >For RHEL6 we're using sope 4.9 from SOGo's own repository, not the
> >2.0.7 version you have packaged.. And what's the real upstream for SOPE?
> >sogo.nu or http://sope.opengroupware.org/en/source/index.html ?
> That also confused me. Ultimately I ended up looking at the release
> dates (SOPE-2.0.7 from [2] was released 23 Jul 2013, sope-4.7.1 from
> opengroupware was released 01 Jul 2007). Plus, I also had a look at
> what debian did, and they packaged 2.0.7 from sogo.
> 
> 
> Sandro
> 
> [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005328
> [2] http://www.sogo.nu/files/downloads/SOGo/Sources/
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct