19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)

Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com
Thu Sep 5 19:04:59 UTC 2013


On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 20:52 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: 
> Am 05.09.2013 20:32, schrieb Sérgio Basto:
> > On Qui, 2013-09-05 at 16:35 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: 
> >> do we get this annoying wrong display in GRUB fixed
> >> inside the F19 lifetime or *at least* if i remove it
> >> from /boot/grub2/grub.cfg and have only
> >> "Fedora (3.10.10-200.fc19.x86_64)" get away insist at
> >> *every* kernel update add " 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat)"
> >> again?
> > 
> > I think that depends on /etc/default/grub 
> > if you have the line 
> > GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="$(sed 's, release .*$,,g' /etc/system-release)"
> 
> how should it?
> 
> /etc/grub/default does (thanks god) *not* matter in
> case of kernel-updates by yum and grubby

yes, so investigate new-kernel-pkg from grubby 


> ____________________
> 
> even if:
> 
> [root at testserver:~]$ cat /etc/default/grub | grep GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR
> GRUB_DISTRIBUTOR="Fedora"
> ____________________
> 
> so, no whatever macro is repsonsible for this exactly at the release
> with a non well thought release name this happens - why in the world
> does Fedora again and agin make decisions which are *not* tested and
> months before release the impact is known are *not* reverted?
> 
> *do not touch my hand-made grub-configuration due kernel-updates*
> except teh path to the kernel and initrd which works since many
> years - *nobody* needs release names at all and and least
> nobody needs inisting in show them at the first output at boot
> in a broken way
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Sérgio M. B.



More information about the devel mailing list