Wider feedback requested on two changes to our base/core defaults

[Lennart Poettering]

On Mon, 09.09.13 18:30, Simo Sorce (simo at redhat.com) wrote:

> Kerberos and x509 both require FQDNs.
> It makes no sense to stick to short names for servers, and having a FQDN
> on a laptop does not hurt anything (a FreeIPA enrolled laptop must have
> a FQDN anyway as it uses the keytab to do validation).

So, which fqdn do I configure my laptop to?

> So can you please stop breaking servers just to show 'pretty' names ?

I am breaking anything? That is news to me... The tools allows fqdn, as
I wrote. 

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.