abrt Bugzilla summary

Pierre-Yves Chibon pingou at pingoured.fr
Mon Sep 16 08:58:47 UTC 2013


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:36:41AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:38:41AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:35:20 +0200
> > Jakub Filak <jfilak at redhat.com> wrote:
> > > a bugzilla ticket [1] requiring a better Bugzilla summary field text
> > > produced by abrt has been filed. Before I start changing the bug
> > > summary format I'd like to do a little survey:
> > > 
> > > What would you like see in the bug summaries produced by abrt?
> > 
> > I actually disagree with the reporter of the bug. 
> > 
> > I prefer to have the component name in the subject of the bug. It's
> > true that you can look this up by going to the bug on the web and that
> > it's in the initial email, but after that the context of update emails
> > is not there, so it's harder for me to know _which_ of the many abrt
> > bugs this is. 
> 
> Please, fix/improve your email client UI. All bugzilla emails
> contain all necessary information in email header:

Because opening email headers is indeed so convenient.

>   for example:
> 
>         X-Bugzilla-Reporter:
>         X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/
> 
> 
> For example if you use mutt then all you need is to add
> 
>     unignore X-Bugzilla-Product X-Bugzilla-Component

This is nice and handy, but I actually don't know many client offering this
opeiton.
/me gonna add this option to his muttrc (lucky that I do use mutt here and
there).

> It's pretty common that we don't have component name in BZ summary...

Which does not make it less annoying.

Pierre


More information about the devel mailing list