thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

drago01 drago01 at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 14:08:29 UTC 2013


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at thelounge.net> wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.09.2013 15:41, schrieb Remi Collet:
>> Le 24/09/2013 12:35, Reindl Harald a écrit :
>>
>>> and that is why ist *is wrong* to give negative karma because some
>>> extension is not updated - who says that the extension RPM is
>>> relevant for all users?
>>
>> I don't agree. Broken dep are not acceptable in "stable" release
>
> if one person maintains thunderbird and the other one lightning
> how do you imagine that both packages are built at the same
> moment and get the same karma?

People can talk to each other or give commit access to each others packages.

> this is a organisation problem and again:
>
> a broken depdendency for lightning is *never* a reason
> to give thunderbird bad karma -

s/never/always/ ...

We shouldn't even allow updates to go through (even updates-testing)
with broken deps.
Every update should have to pass autoqa's depcheck before it gets pushed at all.


More information about the devel mailing list