Hello! Also, packaging baresip for Fedora

[Lars Kellogg-Stedman]

On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 06:14:30PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> Doesn't look too bad ;) judging based on very brief look at the spec file,
> but it violates the Static Library Packaging Guidelines, and I wonder
> who "owns" %{_datadir}/re?

I've removed the static library and made the package an explicit owner
of %{_datadir}/re.  

> > %{_libdir}/libre.so
> 
> A version-less library is less than ideal, however. How stable is the API/ABI?

Yeah, that's my feeling, too, but that's what the upstream Makefile
currently produces.  I wasn't sure how invasive I should be in terms
of patching the upstream build process.

-- 
Lars Kellogg-Stedman <lars at redhat.com>