F21 System Wide Change: lbzip2 as default bzip2 implementation
a.badger at gmail.com
Thu Apr 3 02:26:59 UTC 2014
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 08:47:11PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> I think the "right" way to move forward is to make a library that is at
> least API-compatible with the current libbz2.so.1, make all the tools
> use it, and just replace bzip2 with lbzip2.
Although I'm still on the fence about whether I'd vote for the Change as is,
I tend to agree with this sentiment.
Having two sets of code with different characteristics seems like
isomething of a disservice to users (I started bzip'ing my logs and backups
because the performance was suitable for my task when I tested with
/usr/bin/bzip2 but then when I operated on those logs with a custom python
script it was 3x slower!)
From past precedent I agree that getting the new package to the point where
we think it's a suitable replacement and then just making the switch for the
next release makes the most sense.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
More information about the devel