[CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default

[Miloslav Trmač]

2014-04-03 15:06 GMT+02:00 Simo Sorce <simo at redhat.com>:

> On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 19:15 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 02:12:50PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> > > How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?
> >
> > Posting here is a good start. You can also add a note in the FESCo ticket
> > for approval once one is filed, and if you are incredibly passionate you
> can
> > come to the FESCo meeting (although I'm hoping we can make those meetings
> > more efficient, so that's not a good place for back and forth -- if
> possible
> > we should work out the issues before the meeting).
>
> Ticket number ?
>

The ticket will be filed around the end of the comment period (which hasn't
even started for this change, because it hasn't been announced by the
Wrangler), and visible to devel@ in the FESCo agenda mail usually sent
about a day before the meeting.

(Yes, you would need to do some work to track all of this.  But you should
expect FESCo members to carefully read all comments on the mailing list
without having to explicitly raise concerns in the ticket.)
     Mirek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140403/67fe5bbd/attachment.html>