systemd bugs in F20/F21 -> bug against the distribution?

Reindl Harald h.reindl at
Thu Apr 3 20:51:22 UTC 2014

Am 03.04.2014 22:46, schrieb Martin Langhoff:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl at> wrote:
>> Am 03.04.2014 22:32, schrieb Adam Williamson:
>>> On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> will that below ever get fixed in F20?
>>> The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so
>>> far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd
>>> developers or, well, anyone else.
>> than the developer should explain his point of view and
>> ask for further input instead react with WONT FIX
> Reindl. You are reading to retort, not to understand

i understand more than you imagine

but you need also to understand that a "WON'T FIX" for the reporter
of a bug is the same as spit into his face and so the only correct
reaction of a developer is:

* explain his point of view
* wait for a addtional response
* hestitate to press "NO BUG" or "WON'T FIX" aka "leave me in peace"

if developers are not greatful for users input users are not greatful
for breaking and changing things right and left of them which worked
as expected before

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 246 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <>

More information about the devel mailing list