Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update

[Ankur Sinha]

On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 17:55 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote:
> I had the same problem. It turned out I was missing the glib2 package
> update from the COPR. The reason was that I had both glib2.x86_64 and
> glib2.i686 installed, but I only enabled the x86_64 COPR. dnf silently
> skipped updating the package due to this problem.

We noticed this. Richard updated the install instructions to include
both repos:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/

If using dnf, please use the --best flag. Otherwise, dnf simply skips
broken packages without reporting any errors. Adam added a note to the
updates-testing guide:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing
-- 
Thanks,
Warm regards,
Ankur (FranciscoD)

http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha

Join Fedora! Come talk to us!
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140405/12621bd9/attachment.sig>