Summary of accepted Fedora 21 Changes - weeks 13/14

Petr Pisar ppisar at redhat.com
Tue Apr 8 08:35:10 UTC 2014


On 2014-04-07, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung at 0pointer.de> wrote:
> On Mon, 07.04.14 15:00, Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik at redhat.com) wrote:
>> * PrivateDevices=yes and PrivateNetwork=yes For Long-Running Services
>>   URL: ​
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PrivateDevicesAndPrivateNetwork​
>>   Announcement: ​https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-March/197175.html 
>> 
[...]
> To answer this: the kernel network namespace thing PrivateNetwork= is
> built on disconnects all address families at once. There's no choice to
> only disassociate some address families, either all or none. (except for
> the weirdness of AF_UNIX sockets in the fs namespace which stay
> connectable as long as the fs is reachable, see feature page).
>
What about D-Bus? D-Bus uses AF_UNIX currently. But as you can know,
there is an aim to move D-Bus to a new protocol family. Is it possible that
all the daemons with a D-Bus control interface will stop work then?

-- Petr



More information about the devel mailing list