F21 System Wide Change: Framework for Server Role Deployment

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Apr 8 13:08:28 UTC 2014

Hash: SHA1

On 04/08/2014 07:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
> <jreznik at redhat.com> wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change:  Framework for Server Role
>> Deployment = 
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FrameworkForServerRoleDeployment
Change owner(s): Miloslav Trma─Ź <mitr AT volny DOT cz>, Fedora Server
>> Group <server AT lists DOT fedoraproject DOT org > Responsible
>> WG: Server
>> A new D-Bus service, and associated command-line tools, to deploy
>> and manage Server Roles.
>> == Detailed Description == A new D-Bus service will be made
>> available, exposing available server roles, making it possible to
>> deploy, configure and manage them. Appropriate functionality will
>> also be exposed as a command-line utility.
>> == Scope == * Proposal owners: Write, document, package and test
>> the D-Bus API. * Other developers: Possibly use the framework for
>> development of new server roles. * Release engineering: Nothing *
>> Policies and guidelines: Nothing
> "Contingency mechanism: Do not ship the Server product with Fedora
> 21. "
> What? That's not a contingency plan thats a "nuke clause" .. we
> could simply not ship any roles and add it in f21 (given that we
> don't have many roles to begin with).

Yes, it's a nuke clause. This Change Proposal is a blocker for
shipping the Fedora Server. Without completing this Change, Fedora
Server is not meaningful. The only two contingencies we have are
"Don't ship Fedora Server" or "Delay the release of Fedora 21".

I think FESCo will need to discuss those two options carefully...
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/


More information about the devel mailing list