Agenda for Env-and-Stacks WG meeting (2014-04-08)

[Toshio Kuratomi]

On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 04:16:58PM +0200, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> On 04/08/2014 03:02 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> >not sure that the ruby scl should have its own change.  It needs to have
> >the equivalent filed for the fpc to evaluate, though.
> >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_(draft)#SCL_Approval_Process
> >
> >Since the guidelines aren't final, probably open an fpc ticket so the
> >fpc sees the request and more that it's needed for the fedora scl
> >change.  Although the scl package guidelines aren't final, the
> >guidelines/criteria for approving the scl itself were approved so fpc
> >should be able to evaluate it in parallel to finishing the packaging
> >guidelines.
> >
> >If we remove the ruby scl change we should add more to the main scl
> >change, though, about expectations around the scl approval.  For
> >instance, we probably want to touch base with docs/marketing to see if
> >they want to publicize scls in the exact same way as fedora changes or
> >have a slightly different procedure.
> >
> >Also note, in case no one saw it in either fpc or fesco meeting notes,
> >I'm traveling to a week and a half conference now followed by a week and
> >a half of vacation.so I likely won't be around for any fedora meetings
> >until april 27th (and playing catch up with my email for that first week.)
> >
> >-Toshio
> >
> >
> >
> I'm trying to provide feature needed by Cloud WG, that's all. I can
> file a new ticket on FPC, but wouldn't it just duplicate
> communication about General SCL guidelines?
> Ruby193 could test workflow around SCL in Fedora, that's another good
> reason to try how far can I get it and what won't work :)
> 
> I would prefer to keep my changes as is and let FESCo decide.
> 
I sense a miscommunication here -- the Draft Guidelines for approving an SCL
say that you need to get the FPC to approve new SCLs:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/SCL_Guidelines_%28draft%29#SCL_Approval_Process

I felt that a new FPC ticket would be good because this is the first SCL to
be approved and the FPC likely won't become aware of it unless it's called
out in a ticket.

-Toshio
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140408/29ff6cb5/attachment.sig>