fedora-atomic discussion point: /usr/lib/passwd
Colin Walters
walters at verbum.org
Fri Apr 11 17:08:49 UTC 2014
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miloslav Trmač <mitr at volny.cz> wrote:
>
> So, having /usr/lib/passwd storing the same limited set of data is
> not the right long-term thing. Unfortunately, AFAIK the fuller
> interface isn't ready yet.
Yeah, it'd be nice to merge the accountsservice database in to the
system db. (And in general, have more consolidation among
shadow-utils/sssd/accountsservice)
> In the really-long-term, really-hand-wavy, future, I think we need to
> move away from the 32-bit UIDs[3],
I agree:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2009-April/msg02456.html
> [2] Overall I'm strongly convinced that the fully-stateless ==
> fully-atomic-updates model is simply unworkable. We can have
> stateless/atomic software installation, but we absolutely do need to
> allow for arbitrary operations to be done on system's state between
> loading the new version on disk and starting it. Fedora-atomic can
> have special support for a few classes of state know in advance, but
> fully general software needs fully general post-installation
> adjustments. (E.g., where does ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN on software
> upgrade fit in the Fedora-atomic model?)
An ExecStartPre= entry in the systemd unit.
More information about the devel
mailing list