default local DNS caching name server

P J P pj.pandit at
Sat Apr 12 05:09:03 UTC 2014

> On Saturday, 12 April 2014 3:55 AM, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> I think there needs to be more emphasis on the /other/ benefit, the
> whole reason I brought this up this time:

  Sure; I tried to cover it in the detailed description as

...Apart from trust, these name servers are often known to be flaky and unreliable. Which only adds to the overall bad and at times even frustrating user experience. In such a situation, having a trusted local DNS resolver not only makes sense but is in fact badly needed. It has become a need of the hour. (See: [1], [2], [3]) 

Also, this thread is linked there at [3].

More information about the devel mailing list