Orphaning java-1.5.0-gcj

Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotnicky at redhat.com
Mon Apr 14 07:44:53 UTC 2014


On Sun 13 Apr 2014 08:42:43 PM CEST Simo Sorce wrote:
> [snip] I know little to nothing about java bindings so if it is
> substantial work I will just remove the java binding and ask rel eng to
> pull the subpackage.

You can't just "pull" packages. You'll have to properly "Obsoletes:
lasso-java" it. I am attaching a patch which worked for me (including a
scratchbuild with openjdk). I haven't actually tested the code, but I
guess it should work (it's JNI though so...meh)

A side note: I believe we generally start release numbering at 1 instead
of 0, but of course it doesn't hurt anything...

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140414/b5632fc2/attachment.sig>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0001-Use-OpenJDK-instead-of-GCJ-for-java-bindings.patch
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 1495 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140414/b5632fc2/attachment.bin>
-------------- next part --------------


--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky at redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Developer Experience

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc.                               http://cz.redhat.com


More information about the devel mailing list