F21 System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL
mmaslano at redhat.com
Tue Apr 15 09:18:31 UTC 2014
On 04/15/2014 12:05 AM, Ken Dreyer wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting at splat.cc> wrote:
>> Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik at redhat.com) said:
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL =
>>> Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano at redhat.com>
>>> Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still commonly used by many projects. Let's
>>> provide Ruby and Rails in SCL even for Fedora. Rails depends on exact v8
>>> version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of the SCL.
>> Is the intent to only provide SCL versions of the older ruby & rails, or
>> also the current versions (i.e., move to SCL as the rails delivery mechanism
>> going forward)?
> Personally I like the direction that Django is taking by shipping
> parallel-installable packages. I think this would be doable for Rails.
> /usr/bin/rails could be handled with alternatives.
> - Ken
Thanks for recommendation, but I need to provide more than one gem. I
know current content of collection is working together well (~60), so
I'd like to keep those gems in their versions.
More information about the devel