F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6
Florian Weimer
fweimer at redhat.com
Wed Apr 16 05:25:39 UTC 2014
On 04/15/2014 03:40 PM, Jan Staněk wrote:
> Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
>> Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik at redhat.com) said:
>>> == Scope ==
>>> * Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper versioning
>>> in order to not confuse the dynamic linker.
>>
>> Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?
>
> Ideally, yes, but given the upstream willingness to incorporate
> community-proposed changes, I fear that we may in fact introduce
> downstream symbol versioning.
There is support for appending a unique suffix to all exported symbols.
See @DB_VERSION_UNIQUE_NAME@ in the sources. It is not ELF symbol
versioning, but it might help.
The conflict between development packages remains, though.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the devel
mailing list