F21 System Wide Change: Workstation: Disable firewall

Josh Boyer jwboyer at fedoraproject.org
Wed Apr 16 16:51:52 UTC 2014


On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Tomasz Torcz <tomek at pipebreaker.pl> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:32:02PM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> > > I think what you are describing could be probably realized with SELinux
>> > > today, just with a special setroubleshoot frontend that catches the AVC
>> > > when the service tries to listen and ask the user if he wants to allow
>> > > it.
>> > >
>> > > However this would still not be completely sufficient as you completely
>> > > lack any context about what network you are operating on.
>> > >
>> > > The firewall's purpose is to block access to local services on bad
>> > > networks too, it is not a binary open/close equation when you have
>> > > machines (laptops) that roam across a variety of networks.
>> > >
>> > > Simo.
>> > >
>> > Nothing worse then asking Users Security related questions about opening
>> > firewall ports.
>> > Users will just answer yes, whether or not they are being hacked.
>> >
>> > firefox wants to listen on port 9900 in order to see this page, OK?
>>
>>
>> Which is not what I proposed Dan.
>>
>> I in fact said we should *NOT* ask per application.
>>
>> What we should ask is one single question, upon connecting to an unknown
>> network: "Is this network trusted ?"
>>
>> If yes you open up to the local network. If no you keep ports not
>> accessible on that network.
>
>   But firewalld currently lacks flexibility to express this fully.

"currently" is the key word.

> Firewalld only classifies "whole" interfaces, which breaks badly in
> many situations.  Consider following scenario:  VM with single
> network interface.  This single interface has RFC1918 IPv4 address AND
> globally accesible IPv6 address.  How it should be described
> in firewalld?
>
>   - for any IPv4 incoming connection, this interface is in "trusted" ("home"?
>     I never know what home/work/dmz/etc really mean)

Sure.

>   - for IPv6 incoming connection from 2001:6a0:138:1::/64 subnet, the zone
>     is still "trusted"

Sure?

>   - for any other incoming connection the zone is "public" (I hope this
>     means "general Internet").

Sure.

>   Above is trivial in iptables, but impossible with firewalld's zones.

So fix it?

josh


More information about the devel mailing list