F21 System Wide Change: Smaller Cloud Image Footprint

Miloslav Trmač mitr at volny.cz
Thu Apr 17 19:47:21 UTC 2014


2014-04-17 1:42 GMT+02:00 Matthew Miller <mattdm at fedoraproject.org>:

> On Thu, Apr 17, 2014 at 01:24:50AM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > I don't think we can, or should, have three separate network
> configuration
> > systems in Fedora at the same time.  We already know how long and painful
>
> I think we'd stay at two, basically -- right now, we have two in use
> (NetworkManager and initscripts) and one that's available but not used by
> default anywhere (systemd-networkd). This would simply swap the status of
> systemd-networkd and initscripts.
>

Is NetworkManager already at the *100% complete* feature parity that would
make this possible?  (Keeping in mind that "possible" and "a good idea" are
still not the same...)

> the migration to NetworkManager has been—and AFAICS networkd doesn't
> > support any of the icfg-* files, unlike NetworkManager, so it would mean
> a
> > *more* painful migration.
>
> Yeah, as I've said elsewhere, I'd love to see a network unit generator
> which
> takes traditional ifcfg-* files as input. I think we need ifup/ifdown
> compatibility scripts, too.
>

Would these be prerequisites to making the change?


> With what I know so far, this would only make sense to me if the Cloud
> > images were explicitly designed to run in a very specific network
> > environment (say, everything via DHCP, no VPNs, no IPSec, no bridges,
> > nothing else), and telling both users and application developers not to
> > touch the configuration in any way.
>
> It is _largely_ the case that complex networking is done outside of the
> guests and presented to the guests as simple interfaces. Usually that's one
> device with DHCP, but there may be additional interfaces with DHCP or
> static
> interfaces.
>

Well, this particular possibility is strictly black/white—either the
completely different configuration and API is exposed, or it isn't; if
there are any alternatives to configure at all, it is exposed.
    Mirek
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140417/4e3ee34d/attachment.html>


More information about the devel mailing list