The Forgotten "F": A Tale of Fedora's Foundations
simo at redhat.com
Tue Apr 22 01:13:38 UTC 2014
On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 17:50 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Look, I think the Foundations are great. They remind us all of why we
> got into this to begin with (or most of us anyway). However, they are
> never going to completely cover all cases. They are broad. They
> project strength and conviction. They can't be worded to be future
> proof because nobody can see the future. They are extremely important
> guideposts on what Fedora is about, but they are not codifications of
> allowed practices and situations.
> If you start tweaking them or adding new ones to list out exceptions
> and allowances and to address the latest computing fad, you weaken
> their ability to act as those guideposts. They instead become case
> law or listings, which leads to less common sense, more process, more
> exceptions to be added, etc. They would become so lengthy and
> complicated that nobody would read them.
> I'm not saying adding additional Foundations or rewording the existing
> ones should never be done, but I do think these specific items you
> mention don't necessarily warrant it at this time.
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
More information about the devel