The Forgotten "F": A Tale of Fedora's Foundations

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Tue Apr 22 15:20:57 UTC 2014


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/22/2014 11:17 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 05:50:20PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> Board seats should absolutely keep in mind various aspects of
>> the entire project, but we need less partisanship and more
>> open-mindedness at this level.  We need people willing to work
>> together to find out what is best for the Project as a whole, not
>> argue on behalf of certain pieces of it.  Compromise and
>> cooperation are what will wind up getting us moving again.
> 
> In other words, if we're going to have one foundation over the
> others, let's make it Friends. :)
> 

I can certainly get behind that.

At this point, I formally withdraw the request to add "Functional" to
the Foundations. This thread has convinced me that the real problem
here is that we've been treating "Freedom" as more important than the
others, and that we probably need to be rebalancing rather than
superseding.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNWiNkACgkQeiVVYja6o6OnjwCeP7/LutNbd1B8CHucnQP7Z4Rw
NXwAn1FU34j5KRAAnPEHSw4DVPaeDVkw
=CsTS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list