Mass bug proposal: packages that auto-enable systemd units
luto at mit.edu
Wed Apr 23 16:34:35 UTC 2014
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 9:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:49:58 -0700
> Andrew Lutomirski <luto at mit.edu> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
>> <zbyszek at in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 12:17:10PM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
>> >> Examples of "runs once then goes away" services
>> >> include iptables and udev.
>> > I removed udev from this paragraph on the wiki, since it's
>> > persistent and is a bad example.
>> Thanks :)
>> If no one tells me otherwise today, I will take the lack of objections
>> to the mass bug filing as consensus.
> It seems like it might be workable to have a provenpackager fix up any
> of these not fixed in a few weeks...
> If you would like to add to the text that after 3 weeks provenpackagers
> may step in and fix these issues, that might be good? Or is there some
> reason that wouldn't be a good idea?
As long as the provenpackager is wiling to double-check that the
change is correct, it sounds good to me.
Most of these seem like copies of a buggy sysv conversion script and
don't even happen on initial installation, so it seems very unlikely
that important package functionality depends on the scripts running.
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
More information about the devel